It is not merely of some importance, but is fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.
[Lord Hewit]
Please keep an open mind and let me have my day in court. I deserve a fair trial like any other American Citizen. I will be acquitted and vindicated when the truth is told.
[Michael Jackson]
Michael Jackson 2005 Trial Statement
Totally Innocent of All Charges
On the 13th June 2005 Michael Joe Jackson wa cleared of all counts against him by the Superior Court of the State of California.
Michael Jackson Innocent!!!!!!!!!
The Verdict
Count 1 VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Conspiracy in Count One of the indictment”.
Count 2 VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child as charged in Count Two of the Indictment.”
Count 3 VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child in Count Three of the Indictment”.
Count 4 VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child as charged in Count Four of the Indictment”.
Count 5 VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child in Count Five of the Indictment.”
Count 6 VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Attempting to Commit a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child as charged in Count Six of the Indictment.”
Count 7 VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Administering an Intoxicating Agent to Assist in the Commission of a Felony as charged in Count Seven of the Indictment.”
Count 7 Lesser Offense VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Providing Alcoholic Beverages to Persons Under the age of 21, a lesser included offense of that charged in Count Seven of the Indictment.”
Count 8 VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Administering an Intoxicating Agent to Assist in the Commission of a Felony as charged in Count Eight of the Indictment.”
Count 8 Lesser Offense VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY Providing Alcoholic Beverages Under the Age of 21, a lesser offence included offense of that charged in Count Eight of the Indictment.”
Count 9 VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Administering an Intoxicating Agent to Assist in the Commission of a Felony as charged in Count Nine of the Indictment.”
Count 9 Lesser Offense VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Providing Alcoholic Beverages to Persons Under the Age 21, a lesser included offense of that charge in Count Nine of the Indictment.”
Count 10 VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Administering an Intoxicating Agent in the Commission of a Felony as charged in Count Ten of the Indictment.”
Count 10 Lesser Offense VERDICT
“We the Jury in the above entitled case find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Providing Alcoholic Beverages to Persons Under the Age of 21, a lesser included offense of that charge in Count Ten of the Indictment.”
The coverage of the trial was global, the prosecution case was fully explored, but the winning defence case was under reported and in fact Michael Jackson was not permitted to put forward his views save for a statement as a result of a leak to the media.
Thus many people don’t know why the prosecution case failed.
They don’t know that there was a lack of evidence and that the prosecution evidence failed, not because of the clever and sharp skills of Michael’s team, no disrespect, but because the prosecution was never going to be successful. Put simply there was no evidence against Michael Jackson.
So despite the prosecution international and internet search for further victims, none were found. No other child/adult victims gave evidence against Michael Jackson.
The case was global in its coverage and thorough, the FBI was called to assist and found nothing. There had been several raids on Neverland, in one instance it was reported that 70 officers attended Neverland, the largest swoop, I hear ever.
Wouldn’t it be reasonable to say, that given the millions pumped in to prove the case and the multiple agencies used, the intense media interest and some of the media gunning for Michael, that if anything could have been found to support the prosecution it would have been presented?
The Jury – Vindication for Michael Jackson
Michael Jackson Not Guilty 13th June 2005
